Self-Relativity
I wanted to get a little more into how I started thinking about self-relativity in the first place [see anti-gravity]. I’ve tried to picture the universe in it’s entirety for about as long as I can remember. Once upon a time I used to see numerous universes existing throughout space, big-bangs occuring and collapsing with great distances between universes. I felt that way through much of my eary teen years until I started to question what defines space and dimension, and what would happen if we were to move far enough away from the universe. Some of my early thoughts were that space would curve back in on itself at the edge of the universe, and though we may travel in a straight line eventually we’d start to head back towards our starting point. Next I began to question what then would the universe as a whole be relative to? I started recognizing that the universe must be relative to itself, and I extended that to work with particles and larger bodies of matter. At about that point I began to consider that if it were possible to move far enough away from the ‘mass’ of the universe, an object would start to orbit itself. The why was that some form of relativity must exist in order to define dimension. Perhaps the object would break apart but its component particles would still exist in some form. In effect, I believe that if an object were to move far enough from the universe (as defined by the universes mass), it would begin to behave as a second universe. There are a number of arguments against this idea, but it seems to make sense to me. In this regard distance and speed could be interchangeable. At a high enough velocity mass will behave in the same way as if it were a far enough distance away from the universes mass. I personally haven’t heard much of the issue of self-relativity, if anything on the subject before, but I think it will prove to be an important concept. In a supra-compressed universe the potential for an objects mass to interfere with itself could become an issue, at the very least ‘like’ or identical masses would have difficulty with trying to exist in the same space at the same time. Gravity in that regard I believe is a curvature of space time to prevent two or more masses from attempting to occupy the same point, an echo of some sort saying ‘i will be there soon and have approximately this much mass’. If a correct picture of movement of a mass would have some of its mass preceeding the majority of the object, then it could more readily interact with another body. So that say a very heavy mass is heading towards a very slight mass, the point where they would meet both have relatively equal ‘weight’ at the leading edges of the bodies movement. Space would curve near equally between these two points, next more mass comes and space would curve slightly more. Eventually however the larger body will outdo the slighter mass. In this way the two masses would not occupy the exact same space at the same time, the distances would be infinitely small but I do believe gravity is some form of a bending of space to prevent multiple masses from ‘tunneling’ into the same space at the same time as would be a common occurance in a super compressed universe with the same mass that the universe has now.
